Internet Censorship Means No Freedom of Speech -- Argumentative Persua

Picture it you pick up your phone to shew your email. Youre expecting a inwardness from a friend, who is sending you some information on breast cancer, but when you check your inbox there is instead a message from the server. It says the message that was direct to you from the address of your friend has been intercepted because it contained indecent material that did non comply with FCC regulations of the meshing. You call your friend only to find that the police turn out come and taken her a elan, and she is now facing up to two old age in prison and/or up to $100,000 in fines. The message sent by your friend contained the word breast, which by current FCC standards is indecent, and thus non permitted to be transferred on the net profit. Due to this, your friend is now subject to sorry charges. Sound ridiculous? Unreasonable? Perhaps even a cunt scary? It is all three of these things, but further, it is impending reality. This shoes is real possible, in the very near future. On February 8, 1996, President Clinton signed the exon Bill, part of the Communications Decency Act a bill which makes the possibility of this situation a frightening reality. This bill will allow the government to outlaw the Internet, by any means it deems necessary. Under the CDA the seven dirty nomenclature, as well as anything the government considers sexually explicit or indecent, will be banned from the Internet. The CDA, however, will not be enforceable until all appeals made against it by organizations such as the Citizens Internet Empowerment Coalition (CIEC), and the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT), are resolved. The Internet is a worldwide medium for communication and the transfer of information. It is also, theoretica... ...Internet. They also succeeded in doing this without government interference, or threatening our rights as Americans. Further, it does this in a way which keeps parents involved in their electric shavers activities, and preser ves the parental right to decide what their child is exposed to. It also ensures that the growth of the Internet is not stunted in any way. If people are educated on this issue, then they will be aware of what is occurring in this conflict, so they will be put in to stand up for their rights. Anyone who is informed on the subject will not want to risk losing their rights or liberty. Further, if there are solutions which will shelter children on the Internet that at the same time protect our freedom of speech and the growth of the Internet and all its information, thus appeasing both sides, it is only logical and reasonable that we follow them.