Violence in Literature Essay -- Violence Blood Violent Movie Literatur

Violence in LiteratureIm taking you to the bank, Senator Trent. To the blood bank.This line is spoken by a case played by Steven Segal in the picture show Hard to Kill, a movie remarkably similar to constantlyy other motion picture Segal has ever touched, and depressingly reflective of a larger cultural trend. In Segals movies, characters with names like Orin Boyd and Nico Toscani boast body counts and a shared unsatisfied thirst for vengeance. Death becomes a prop employed to dispatch of import characters, and a cycle of one-upmanship ensues we saw Segal rip someones pharynx out in Under Siege, so the next movie has to be more ridiculous in its sheer level of violence to be marketable. In 1999, it came as no real shock to viewers when Segals character stabbed a Nazi sympathizer in the neck with a broken wine glass. The reality is that technology gives us the means to place images and messages of unparalleled intensity, and as we do that, reality is recursively recreated. As artists and media moguls say less, they examine to compensate through force, resulting in a constant barrage of thundery sound that amounts to nothing more than noise or visuals so moth-eaten and exaggerated that the thin shreds of meaning behind them are utterly lost. In this context, death is watered down until it becomes comfortably palpable. Theatres full of families cheer when the zep shoots the bad guy in an action movie, but it never crosses a single mind that a murder has taken place. Viewers run expressions of smug satisfaction when a crooked lawyer is double-crossed, but the underlie web of lies fazes nobody. In this context, authors have to shout over the noise to die the true evils that float between humans. There is no longer ... ...organization in which individually is sacrificed for the sake of an ideal (Nazism, in this case), its easy for a smaller group to become victimized. That group is doubly under eruption from without and within, and even after the bat tle is apparently over, they are still losing. The internal threat in such organizational bodies has to be recognized by humanity and ingrained into the memories of future generations to ensure that these mistakes arent repeated. Bringing no-good images and situations the forefront of art isnt gimmicky, and it isnt entertaining. Its indispensable. When punches are held the luff is only half-made. Vividly bringing to life the tragedies of the world is the only substance in which we can come to understand them with any validity, and understanding these atrocious circumstances is the only means through which we can learn from them.